DU 6 RSS

What are you doing here is hawabaji, usual; for Sanghis. Refute what I am saying. t? I am having copies of 'Bumnch of Thought'; 'Integral Humanism' and ' We and our nationhood defined'. If you read to understand, please tell me what is out of context? Golwalkar makes a plea for an undefined "PARAKRAMVAD" opposed to revolutionary militant movement in the leadership of HSRA (under the leadership of Bhagat Singh etc)[Bunch of Thought(BOT), Vikram Prakashan Banglore, 1969, p133] and considered revolutionary as well as peaceful anti-British movements were bound to drift into reactionary channels[BOT p 335] and praises Hitler for keeping up "purity of Race and Culture..... by purging the country of Semantic races -- Jews" and considers for Svayamsevaks, the NAZI type "Race sprite at its highest" as "good lesson in Hindustan to learn and profit by"[We or Our Nationhodd defined p 35]. I will send you a copy of my paper. Tell me what is out of place here. I have quoted above that GOlwalkar and DD Upadhyay both considered Manu as the first, greatest and wisest law giver in the history of mankind. Why IO moved from Sciences to social sciences is beyond you comprehension.. What are you doing is baseless personal slander as is usual with Sanghis. This is lat comment as no more comments, as Sanghis debate for debate sake as their minds are closed.