Sunday, August 18, 2013

Nationalism and the egalitarian Alternatives


Nationalism and the egalitarian Alternatives

Ish Mishra

As Benedict Anderson has rightly pointed out in The Imagined Communalities, the concept of nationalism as a new identity criterion and as a hegemonic ideology “was born in an age when Enlightenment and revolutions were destroying the legitimacy of divinely ordained hierarchical dynastic realm”. In fact the basis of the secular allegiance in place of the old religious-feudal is traced to the European Renaissance. Machiavelli’s prince is not a hereditary ruler but a Condotierre – a mercenary leader who leads people to found a new state and uses religion as an instrument to keep people faithful and united. Renaissance marked the epochal transition not only in terms of emancipatory creativities and unprecedented intellectual explosions but also the replacement of one form of the social configurations by the other. It also witnessed the emergence of a new species of the heroes – the hero of the finance. This new hero – the Print capitalist -- of Anderson was struggling for the inclusion of money making in the circle of virtues, even if the peripheral one. This peripheral hero in 150 years time acquired the centre stage and its chief spokesperson of the time John Lock categorically declared that governance is a serious matter it can be entrusted to only those who have proved their worth by amassing sufficient wealth. This would be ruling class preferred the unified absolutist monarchies, the precursor of the modern, liberal state – the nation state as to scattered feudatories and the pyramids of vassals and the overlords. It used the invention of printing press to disseminate the new ideas in vernaculars to maximize its circulation. This facilitated the local dialects to interact with each other leading to a common discourse. In the words of Anderson, “European nations formed around national print language”. Hobbes is the first clear-cut liberal thinker whose man made almighty   with enough coercive power to overawe the entire humanity, is a contractual authority to create order for the protection of the persons and the properties. This unquestioned obligation of the loyalty to the state is transformed into the ideology of nationalism and the amorphous, abstract national interest. The development of capital from industrial/national to international to global and corresponding changes in the character of nation state and the nationalism would be interesting to look t but beyond the scope of this paper. The capital is no more international but is global in the sense that it is not geocentric either in terms of source or the investment. The nation states were imperialist. Nationalism has been and continues to be jingoist and parochial.  Nationalism is also used in non-territorial, e.g. ethnic, religious, and cultural terms also. But this paper is concerned with only political nationalism. Nationalism in India and other colonies emerged as the ideology of the anti colonial movements. Thus nationalism, regardless of inequalities and exploitations, is conceived as the basis of “deep, horizontal comradeship”. (Anderson) Earlier blood shed through wars took place in the name of religion or faith now they take in the name of nation in the national interest, though, God is not undermined. George bush consulted him before attacking and keeping occupation forces had consulted God. When ever there is some crisis in the government, nationalist sentiments are aroused, generally thorough hoax of danger to nation. Our heroes achieve martyrdom fighting heroically for the nation and their soldiers are butchered. We don’t say that we have killed so many humans together. Some killings take place in the name of Bharat Rashtra and some in the name of Hindu Rashtra. At any “war like situation” Ambanis, Subrat Roy Saharas and their likes most loudly pronounce their nationalism. One is reminded of Samuel Johnson that patriotism is the last resort of scoundrels. As far characterization of nation state and nationalism as its ideology is concerned, Marx’s view expressed in the Communist Manifesto as the executive committee to manage the general affairs of bourgeois classes holds as true now as before. That is why a communist has no nation irrespective of the accident of the birth.

Much has been vividly discussed, debated and critiqued about various aspects of the nationalism in its various socio-historical contexts by many distinguished scholars and Political Scientists during the program from which all of us enormously benefited. But it seems that we have taken it under TINA syndrome as permanent feature of the human history, and did not explore and debate the theories and possibilities of alternatives.

 The revolutionary aspect of Hegel’s theory of Dialectics is that anything that exists is destined to perish through evolutionary quantitative changes and revolutionary qualitative changes on the confluence of objective and subjective factors. Owing to the time and space limitations comprehension discussion on various challenges to the nation-state i.e. the bourgeois state and alternatives offered. I will just touch upon some of them. The first serious challenge the theories of nationalism as an ideology of bourgeois state came from the 18th century vagabond philosopher Rousseau. Rousseau was a romantic rebel against the Locke’s tradition that eulogized property. In reaction Rousseau eulogized the nature and transported the notions of good and evil from metaphysics to social-physics. Not the obscure wishes of some God were responsible but society for the evils and hence it is the society only which has to cure. Rousseau a common man himself created people, who till then treated as dupes, tools of the princes, princes themselves were different matter. Rousseau rejected the contracts of his predecessors’ as the contracts of the bondage. He transformed the state in a way to look its antithesis. Sovereignty lies with the free people in their collectivity. Un-freedom can not be a right therefore they would be forced to be free. Rousseau’s general will is a romantic solution to the real problem. His kind of collective sovereignty and participatory democracy is a fit model for pre-modern rustic socialism, theory of scientific socialism was to be worked out by Marx and Engels. Rousseau proved that revolution is not only desirable but possible. Continue bombarding the Bastille. Revolution did happen, just that Rousseau was no more to rejoice it. One glaring model of experiment of the theory of General Will was short-lived Paris commune which became the model for the theory of dictatorship of proletariat. Rousseau’s democratic theory of popular sovereignty has forced the subsequent bourgeois states to begin their constitutions with, “We the people”.

Between Rousseau and Marx, we have various other theories and models of alternatives – anarchists, who along with communists were integral part of the 1st International. The utopian socialists -- August Comte, Fourier, Robert Owen- - about whom Engels’ Socialism: Utopian and Scientific gives comprehensive account of their theoretical lacunas and failure of their attempts to create socialism due to lack of dialectical approach.

Another alternative model is Gandhi’s theory of state, if used as a method and not the model it can be an influential theory of a decentralized bourgeois state that shall be less oppressive.

Of course, as discussed and debated with great details in course of over last 150 years, the real and viable alternative is a global society in which exploitation of human by man shall be made impossible, a society of human emancipation where everyone has appropriate conditions to realize one’s creative potentialities. History never ends its moves ahead and its motor does not have back gear. This social transformation shall happen broadly within the basic principles of Marxism, which is a dynamics, a theory of change and not the statics. For people who consider it statics, Marx had once pejoratively said, “Thanks God! I am not a Marxist “! Marxism does not mean only writings of Marx but had been enriched by kaleidoscopic debates by a galaxy of Marxist scholars including Lenin, Trotsky, Mao and the short stature, one of the tallest intellectual of the 20th century, Antonio Gramsci. The process of enrichment is on.

USSR and CPC never said they are socialist countries but People’s Republics. Tons of obituaries had been written to socialism. They were just experiments. Capitalism is world system hence its alternative has to be global. Oppression is global so the resistance has to be global.  National revolutions under the leadership of socialist/communist parties were experiments in the lower stage of socialist building. These revolutions played their historical role. Randhir Singh’s Crisis of Socialism comprehensively and scientifically deals with the debates and development in the growth and decline of the USSSR.

Eventually, I will just refer to contemporary debates and developments on building socialism. There are people’s movements in Latin America, Europe, USA, Russia, in fact all over the world.  As Nivedita’s well researched paper on Trans-nationalism and her presentation on the subject tells about various kind of transnational amorphous groups are getting into bi and multilateral common discourse and action at a global scale. May it be prelude to a 5th international (4th was formed by Trotsky, though not much talked about. Imperative is an analysis of nation-state in present corporate led globalization era of capitalism. As an over optimist, I shall conclude my presentation with the slogan, “workers shall unite as they have nothing to lose but chains and gain the global human emancipation where the principle of “from each according to ability to each according to need” principle shall prevail.
























                                                                                                    

Saturday, August 17, 2013

खुदा का बुत

मित्र खुर्शीद अनवर की बुत बनने की खाहिश पर खुदा से मेरी गुजारिश--

खुदा के बुत से गुजारिश है की तुम्हारी यह खाहिश पूरी कर दे, कर तो मैं भी सकता हूं , लेकिन बहुत झंझट का काम है. पहले तुम्हारी उल-जलूल ये सब बातें और ईश-निंदा और उनके भक्तों को गाली-गलौच की तुम्हारी काफिराना हरक़तों और देशद्रोह को प्रोत्साहन देने वाली तुकबंदियों को इकट्ठा करके छापना और उन्हें महान प्रमाणित करना पडेगा, दोस्तों से चन्दा इकट्ठा करके तुम्हे मारने की सुपाड़ी देना पडेगा ताकि हम तुम्हे शहीद साबित कर सकें. fir धरना-जुलूस, आमरण अनसन करना पड़ेगा जिससे सरकार तुम्हारी शहादत पर मुहार लगाने के लिए मजबूर हो जाए और जे.एन.यु. के पूर्वी द्वार के पास के तिराहे को गोलचक्कर में तब्दील करके वहां तुम्हारा आदमकद बुत लगे और पूर्वी मार्ग से शैक्षणिक परिसर के गोलचक्कर तक की सड़क को शहीद खुरशीद(खुर) मार्ग घोषित करे. अब सोचये खुदा साहब कितनी झंझट है, अगर हम इतना कर सकते तो इस कमबख्त के साथ मिलर आप और आपके बन्दों के खिलाफ कोहराम न मचा देते! इसलिए हे खुदा साहब आप को तो बस उंगली हिलाना है(अगर खुदाओं के उंगली होती हो) और मेरे इस बदमिजाज दोस्त की बुत बनकर सभी तरह के जज्बातों से मुक्ति की खाहिश पूरी हो जायेगी.

Thursday, August 15, 2013

मजिल का सुरूर.

जज्बात में भर कर उमंग
चलती जाओ उम्मीदों के संग
कट ही जायेगी राह
हो जब मंजिल की चाह
हो जायेगी सारी थकान दूर
चढ़ेगा जब मजिल का सुरूर.
[ईमि/१५.०८.२०१३]\

The Kalinganagar


The Kalinganagar: The Heat and the Dust of a Highway

Ish Mishra

On 2nd January 2007 -- the first anniversary of the martyrdom of anti-displacement agitators – thousands of people from across the country gathered at BIR BHUMI (Ambagadia village) in the Kalinganagar area of Sukhinda valley in Orissa to participate in the Bisthapan Birodhi Samkalp Samabesh (anti-displacement convention), organized by the Bisthapan Birodhi Janmanch (BBJ) to pay tributes to the martyrs who laid their lives in the anti-displacement struggle, and to reaffirm their resolve to carry the fight to its logical conclusion. Thirteen stone pillars have been erected there in memory of the dead.  It also marked the first anniversary of the heroic struggle of the people, successful blockade of a National Highway, now for over a year that is unheard in the recent history. The intensity, quality and the magnitude of the movement forced the government to announce its willingness to hold negotiations with the agitators. Till few months ago government was adamant. "The government stopped all dialogue after we had one with the chief minister," according to Ravi Jarika, a leader of the BBJ. "All promises including withdrawal of cases against us were forgotten. It's the government and not us who created this situation in Kalinganagar and people anywhere will rise in revolt whenever the government behaves in such fashion." In July 2006, Balkishore Panda, the ADM Kalinganagar had adamantly told a fact-finding team of Janhaskshep (a human rights group), the “land had already been acquired” and the tribals holding on to their lands are “legitimate” and “illegitimate” encroachers. In January 2007, the Collector of Jaipur (District Head Quarter of Kalinganagar), Arvind Padhi had to change the official claim.  “The interests of the displaced will not be compromised in the industrialization process”. The families of the dead are part-and parcel of the movement have summarily rejected the compensation offers of Rs. 10 lakhs. "Thirteen people have laid down their lives not to get more money but to retain our land. That stand can never change," said Hara Jamuda of Chandia village.

This Congregation of people – representatives of the progressive radical Political Forces including the parties of the radical left, Mass Organizations, the Mass Movements, Anti-displacement organizations -- from the villages of Kalinganagar and surrounding villages across the Sukinda valley, other parts of Orissa and from across the country saluted the martyrs and resolved to intensify and expand the movement and link it with other anti-imperialist movements. A draft declaration – The Kalinganagar Declaration -- on the future of the movement was circulated in which all out opposition to acquisition of agricultural land for industrial/commercial/SEZ purposes was reasserted. On a planted PIL by someone supposedly having suffered irreparable loss due to the Road blockade, as expected Orissa High Court recently passed a judgement ordering the removal of the blockade. Character of the judiciary of any legal system is same as the character of the ruling classes. Government wants to use coercion through judiciary. Government through its home secretary has expressed its desire to talk to the leaders of the movement. The BBJ leadership is always open to talks but has warned of militant retaliation by the masses if the government uses the force.


 Since 2nd January 2006 the people of Kalinganagar, a tribal belt in the mineral-rich Sukhinda valley of Orissa, are fighting a valiant battle. It was on this day 13 Adivasis were killed by Navin Patnayak government’s extreme brutality and barbarism at the behest of a corporate house – TATAs. The limbs – palms and other parts -- of the dead bodies, were cut off and not returned to the relatives. This barbaric arrogance on the part of the state-corporate nexus, is a reminiscence of the barbarism witnessed during the Colonization by the Europeans in general, and colonization of Americas in particular. So not so surprisingly, the commanders of the attack --the District Collector and the SP -- directly responsible for ordering the firing and trapping the fleeing protesters with the landmines, have been duly rewarded with virtual promotions. According to Birsingh Gop of Chandia village, a victim of land mines explosion, the mines were laid before the Police action of 2nd January with the purpose of killing and maiming the people.

Inspired by the martyrdom of their co-protesters against forced displacement, the villagers resolved to intensify their struggle. They organized themselves under the banner of Bisthapan Birodhi Janamanch with a leadership and a core group emerged from within the movement. They have been able to prevent the NGO’isation and are not dependent on “revolutionary” intellectuals “from above” for guidance in planing their strategies and tactics. They have their own organic intellectuals. They refuse to discuss the merits and demerits of any R&R package. They are firm on their stand – No Displacement. They are also firm in their resolve to continue their struggle undeterred by coercion and harassment; threats and appeasement by newer and newer R&R packages; Court Orders; and planted dissention and allurement. The sense of co-victim has brought the Adivasis and non-Adivasis together on one platform. All the attempts to foil this unity have been foiled by the people. The area around the NH200 that goes up to the Paradip port has been declared out-of-bounds for the company -Tata -, state officials and their agents. The brutal repression of the movement and tribal’ valiant fight have transformed the Kalinganagar from a proper noun to common noun

According to a news report, “at least three land surveyors working for Tata Steel were beaten up Wednesday in Orissa's Jajpur district by angry villagers who fear the company's proposed steel plant in the region would displace them. The incident took place near Kalamatia village in Kalinganagar industrial complex, some 60 km from the district headquarters of Jajpur, when a team of GO Design, a private firm hired by the Tatas, was conducting contour surveys”.(IANS 17 January 2007)

In fact the district administration has been trying to take over the land for the Tata’s proposed steel Plant for the last few months after an attempt to start construction on May 9, 2005 was foiled by the resistance of the local Adivasis.  Adivasis aware with the fate of displaced by other mining and industrial projects in the Sukhinda Valley and else where claimed that they will not vacate the land till their demands are met. From 23rd December 2005, people stated getting feed back regarding Government’s intentions to evict the tribals from their land by force. According to Chkradhar Haibru, the President of BBJ, the agitators conveyed back the message to the administration that such a move will lead to do or die resistance. During their annual convention at the Chandiya village on 1st January, the people came to know through their sources in the administration that the TATAs would initiate Boundary wall construction on the 2nd January 2006 without taking the consent of the people. The tribals decided to oppose this attempt also, as they have opposed the earlier ones. On 2nd January 2006 in the morning, the district administration including the Collector and the SP and TATA Steel officials reached the site with a bulldozer, and started construction of the boundary wall. The team was escorted by 12 platoons of armed police armed with sophisticated weapons.



Seeing the beginning of the work, approximately 100 tribals gathered, and a four-member delegation was formed to go and talk to the district officials present at the spot. People say that the four-member delegation went to meet the district administration. As per the warning given to the administration, many of these people were armed with traditional weapons. When the group of tribals reached the ditch dug to erect the boundary wall, and were about to cross it, they heard the police sound a whistle, and saw a policeman pull a rope. The people say that after this there were large explosions in the ditch and two persons fell down dead. There had been no warning and no indications from the police before this happened. Simultaneously tear gas, rubber bullet firing and actual firing started. Chaos ensued, with people running here-and there. Even the unarmed local policemen panicked at the firing and the explosions, and people say that in this panic one or two policemen fell into the boundary wall ditch and were injured by the tribals in the heat of the moment. On hearing the sound of explosions and firing, more tribals from the nearby settlements rushed to the site. The firing was indiscriminate and continued for over an hour. Even people who were 200-300 meters away were injured. Many people who were trying to escape have bullet injuries in the back, whereas others, who stood and tried to fight back, have been injured in neck and torso in front. A tribal woman, who came out from her house to see what was happening, was struck by a bullet and died. The representatives of BBJ allege that that the police picked up three Adivasis who were lightly injured and couldn’t run away and their hands were chopped off. They died from loss of blood in the Jajpur hospital. The police was armed with sophisticated weapons and the tribals claim that people at a distance of 400 meters were felled by bullets. The agitators ask the pertinent question, that why the administration and the Tatas started the boundary wall construction despite knowing about the tremendous resentment of the local tribals that too with the 12 platoons of the Security personnel.

The firing incidence strengthened the determination of the tribals to fight back and to continue their resistance. They don't trust the parliamentary parties because of obvious reasons. The leadership of the movement is entirely in the hands of the tribals. Those who visit there from outside are treated as solidarity groups if they agree to accept the demands of the tribals. The mainstream media, middle class and ruling elites are not able to digest this simple fact. Therefore, there is deliberate attempt to brand the tribals as Maoists both by the bureaucrats and media.


Bisthapan Birodhi Samkalp Samabesh renamed the place of mass cremation (Ambagadia village) as BIR BHUMI in the memory of the martyrs who laid their life in the anti-displacement movement a year ago. According to the declaration, “People are, therefore, now aware about the real reasons behind displacement in forced to become casual workers without any rights. The anti-displacement movement of the people makes it clear that henceforth people are not willing to accept this humiliating process. In the past, Crores of peasants and rural poor in Kalinganagar, Orissa and other parts of India were forced to accept displacement in the name of development of the country, which is actually the development of the MNCs and their agents. The masses of India are no more prepared to give this kind of sacrifice.” The speakers at the meeting analyzed and explained that due to big industries and projects people are losing their lands and employment and nature is getting devastated. They said that the displacement is accelerating the pace of cultural degeneration of the people. The poor, fighting hard for his land rights, the declaration asserts, “would no more tolerate the policy of alienating the land in the name of rehabilitation and resettlement.” Underlining the nature-devastating nature of the present model of industrialization and its very little employment potential, the declaration maintains that the big projects are being established in the interests of a miniscule minority – national and multinational corporate houses. “This kind of industrialization is anti-people and against the interests of the country. Thus it is the duty of all patriotic Indians to oppose the name of development. Displacement is alienating the lands of the peasants and taking away the livelihood of the poor. Displacement by mining and industrialization projects is converting the peasants and rural poor into destitute.
The Orissa government, boasting of the best R&R policy in the country is indeed protecting in the interests of big industrialists -- the Tatas, Zindals, the Mittals, the Ambanis, the Birlas, the Anil Agrawals and the MNCs such as POSCO.”

 Hitherto anti-displacement movements have centered their demands and mobilization on better Relief and Rehabilitation (R&R) package. Leaders and activists of Bisthapan Birodhi Janamanch are well acquainted with the fate of displaced communities by other projects in and the outside their area. The horrifying stories of land “acquisition” for mining and already existing steel plants are still fresh in their memories – particularly the story of Neelanchal Steel Plant, a public sector unit. Chandradhar Haibru, the President of the BBJ recalls the gory events of that tragic night as a nightmare. Bulldozers accompanied by the Police trucks arrived in the village in the dead of the night. The unsuspecting, sleeping villagers were woken up, bundled into trucks and carried away to jail, reminding the Nazi style of carrying people to the Concentration Camps. The hearths and homes, the forests, the orchards like everything else were razed to the ground in a few hours time. The number of the uprooted families was 639, out of that only 100 have been “rehabilitated” with cash payment and put into company controlled ”colony”, a euphemism for tin roofed structures without any Panchyat rights. They are transformed from a happy farming community with spacious homesteads into wage earners on the mercy of the “company” living a slum-like existence. Rest 539 families disappeared. No one knows their whereabouts and the government and the company have no answers. Like the displaced peasants of other mega and not-so-mega projects, they must have become part of slum or footpath dwellers in some of the cities. Stirred with shock and surprise people became aware of the reality of Development. The activists of JVJ, many of them graduates and post graduates who are farmers by choice, are well aware with the histories of displacements and anti-displacement struggles. They want to remain content agriculturists and are determined to refuse to be proletarianized at the altar of the Development.

They are happy farming communities living in perfect harmony with nature. The crux of their seven-point demand is “No Displacement”, proper rehabilitation of already displaced by other projects with land and punishment to guilty officials responsible for the brutal attack on the peaceful protesters, killing 13 and wounding and maiming many. As compared to many other tribal belts, the Munda tribals of these villages are quite mindful of education. Ravindra Jharika of Ambagadia village, a core group member of the movement, is a postgraduate in Sociology from the Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar. He resigned a government job and is a farmer by choice. After giving the horrifying details of the lives of the earlier development-induces oustees of the area and other parts of Orissa, he argues with technical details that a steel plant needs only 50-60 acres of the land but they acquire thousands of acres, probably for the future real estate development. Tatas alone plan to eventually acquire over 180 Sq. Km area in this mineral belt. He along with many other co-agitators expresses concerns over the over –production of steel beyond the national needs. They also expressed their anxiety over the large-scale export of the mineral ores, particularly the iron ore, raising the doubts upon the “patriotic” intentions of the government and the corporate houses. In this village (Ambagadia), there are other educated men and women pursuing farming by way of choice. The nearest college is 8 Km away. There are 30 college going students in the village – 10 of them girls. All of them are determined to give up their lives but would not leave their land. They are also acquainted with the history of industrial revolution that was accompanied by proletarianization and pauperization of self-sufficient agricultural communities. In Chandia, one of the villages “already acquired” according to Birakishore Panda, the ADM, Kalinganagar, the landmines laid to trap the protesters on 2nd January 2006, have irreparably damaged Birsingh’s legs and he is not sure, whether he would be able to walk on them again. He is agonized and tormented by the design of trapping the people between the Police bullets and the land-mines fencing, and pained at the governmental callousness and indifference towards Adivasis and excessive favor to corporate houses. But ready to further face repression, he is not disappointed and feels confident of continuing the struggle on his crutches.

Well, as always happens there are always traitors in any movement. Few, very few people have been bought over by the government and Tata. But the movement is so powerful that sold-out agents have no courage to face the villagers and have disappeared from the area.  Opin Jamuda of Atti village lost his son in the Police firing refuges to discuss any R&R package and is determined to fight till end. Natti Angarai of Gobarhatti village declared, “we shall give up our lives but not the land. The Government has killed our 13 comrades, we shall not leave the land even if 13000 are killed. People are determined and the movement is gaining momentum and expanding its support base. Oustees of previous mining and industrial projects, anti-displacement mass organizations, pro-people political parties and democratic intellectuals from all over the country have openly come out in its support as was witnessed in the Bisthapan Birodhi Samkalp Samabesh.

 Subhanshu Sekhar Das is an advocate in Jajpur, the District head quarter of Kalinganagar. After talking the follies of the displacement based industrialization, charged the government for allowing the so many plants and industries to use the ground water in violation of the Supreme Court orders, as a result of which the level of ground water has come down to alarming levels. He expressed the hope that the Kalinganagar movement shall eventually grow into an All India anti-displacement, anti-imperialist movement. Professor S.A.Tahir an oustee of the Jindal Steel Plant expressed dissatisfaction over the R&R. According to him only 8 of the 58 ousted families have been “rehabilitated” on the outskirts of the Jajpur town. He expressed his resolve to join the movement despite the allurements and the threats from the government. In his opinion the firing was part of a deep conspiracy. Rjendra Sarangi of Lok Pakkha, a supporter of the movement, is quite confident of the expansion of the base and the support. In July 2006, when a team of Delhi based Janhastakshep – movement against Fascist Designs, held a meeting of intellectuals in Bhubaneshwar after the visit to Kalinganagar, it was attended by a large number of academics, students, artists, writers and poets. Sudhir Nayak, editor of a pro-people Oriya journal Pragatiwadi had informed the gathering that the situation is fast changing and the middle class and the students have begun to debate the issue of displacement in the broader political economic context of the development. Rabindra Sahu a popular Oriya poet linked the displacement with the ideology of capitalism and emphasised that its opposition is imperative responsibility of the radical political forces.

The history of displacement-based development is as old as the history of industrial revolution itself. Slums became the logical corollary of skyscrapers, the landmark symbol of the capitalist development. This model practiced by Europeans, acquired barbaric heights in “developing” the continents of Americas, Africa and Australia, where the original inhabitants were enslaved, massacred or marginalized and fenced into “reserves” or the exteriors. The similar barbarism, of course not at that scale and intensity, is being “legally” resorted to by the state-corporate nexus against the Adivasi peasants for “developing” the Kalinganagar Industrial Complex in the Sukhinda Valley of Orissa.

The Kalinganagar has raised the issues that question this anti people development model and insist upon the debate over the alternative models. Shiny Shenoy, President of the BBJ’s Women’s Committee lost her son in the Police firing but undeterred by allurements and threats, she is determined to be in the forefront of the struggle till the last drop of her blood. After talking in details about the newer methods of mobilization in general and among the women in particular, she delved upon the limitations of the representative democracy. She regretted having voted for Praful Gadai, the Finance Minister of the state, who instead of acting as people’s representative was acting as the agent of Tata. Then, reminding of the Eklavya, she added to it that the Adivasis are used to give away their thumbs but they have learnt to shoot the arrow without using their thumbs. Only future would tell how heroically and for how long the determined villagers can hold against the formidable state-corporate nexus, but the unprecedented support from various quarters, despite the joint conspiracy of all the ruling class parties against it, gives us a ray of hope.

In the light of all round opposition to the land acquisition for SEZ and other industrial/commercial purposes the results of the Kalinganagar movement would set the precedent.

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

काली आँखों का जादू


इन काली आँखों में  दिखता जो काला जादू है
छिपा हुआ उनमें तकलीफ का उमडता समंदर  है
बहार से दिखती शांत सी तिलस्मी शीतलता है
पर धधक एक ज्वालामुखी इनके अंदर है
बनाना है द्वंद्वात्मक एकता अंदर और बाहर में
आओ बन जाएँ मिलकर हम अनेकता में एक  

Monday, August 12, 2013

अदाओं पर फ़िदा

हम तो फ़िदा होते हैं किरदार पर
 न की अदाओं के विचार पर
[ईमि/१२.०८.२०१३]

इश्क पर मुकदमा

इश्क पर मुकदमा क्या बात  कही
हुस्न वालों की फ़रियाद नहीं
आशिकी गढ़ती  है हुस्न की नयी परिभाषा
मत करों किसी मानक सौन्दर्य की आशा
हुस्न को पकड़ा नहीं जा सकता
अमूर्त अवधारण को जकड़ा नहीं जा सकता
आओ करा दें समझौता इश्क-ओ-हुस्न में
मदमस्त रहें दोनों अपनी अपनी धुन में
[ईमि/१२.०८.२०१३].